三星Galaxy Book4 Ultra 评测--配备 120 Hz OLED 和 RTX 4050 的多媒体笔记本电脑三星对 MacBook Pro 16 的回应。 16 英寸Galaxy Book4 Ultra 多媒体笔记本电脑是三星对Apple MacBook Pro 16 的回应。除了 120 Hz 高分辨率 AMOLED 面板外，它还配备了当前的酷睿 Ultra 处理器以及GeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑。不过，Ultra 的价格并不便宜。Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 03/18/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
🇸🇪 🇹🇷 🇫🇷 🇪🇸 🇵🇹 🇮🇹 🇳🇱 🇵🇱 🇷🇺 AI Geforce Laptop / Notebook Meteor Lake Thunderbolt Touchscreen Windows
三星将其Galaxy Book 系列更新至第四代，并推出Galaxy Book 4 Ultra，欲与Apple 的 MacBook Pro 16 直接竞争。与前一年的机型相比，这款产品变化不大，只有酷睿 i7-13700H 被流星湖酷睿 Ultra 7 155H 芯片取代。
价格方面也没有什么变化，基本型号及其酷睿至尊 7 155H 和GeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑的价格为 2399 美元。这仍然是一个非常雄心勃勃的价格，尤其是考虑到微薄的存储规格（16 GB 内存、512 GB 固态硬盘）。如果你花 2999 美元，就能买到配备了 Core Ultra 9 185H和 GeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑以及更多内存和存储空间（32 GB 内存、1 TB SSD）。
Test device courtesy of Samsung Deutschland
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra (Galaxy Book4 Series)ProcessorIntel Core Ultra 7 155H 16 x 3.8 - 4.8 GHz, 65 W PL2 / Short Burst, 45 W PL1 / Sustained, Meteor Lake-HGraphics adapterNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU - 6 GB VRAM, Core: 2055 MHz, RAM: 2000 MHz, 80 W TDP ( including 15 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 551.61, OptimusMemory16 GB , LPDDR5-6400, Dual-Channel, onboardDisplay16.00 inch 16:10, 2880 x 1800 pixel 212 PPI, capacitive, ATNA60CL07-0, OLED, glossy: yes, 120 HzMainboardIntel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCHStorageSamsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, 512 GB , 403 GB freeSoundcardIntel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)Connections1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness SensorNetworkingIntel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3Sizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 17 x 355 x 250Battery76 Wh, 4900 mAh Lithium-IonOperating SystemMicrosoft Windows 11 HomeCameraWebcam: 1080pPrimary Camera: 2 MPixAdditional featuresSpeakers: Quad speakers, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 140W USB-C PSU, 24 Months WarrantyWeight1.823 kg, Power Supply: 351 g
Price2799 EuroLinksSamsung notebook sectionNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications
潜在的竞争对手比较
RatingDateModelWeightHeightSizeResolutionPrice
90.4 %v7 (old)03 / 2024Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraUltra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU1.8 kg17 mm16.00"2880x1800
88.6 %v7 (old)12 / 2023Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon RX 6550M1.8 kg15.8 mm16.00"3840x2400
93.7 %v7 (old)11 / 2023Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 12-Core, M3 Pro 18-Core GPU2.1 kg16.9 mm16.20"3456x2234
88 %v7 (old)08 / 2023Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU2.2 kg18.2 mm16.00"3200x2000
91.1 %v7 (old)03 / 2024HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU2 kg19.8 mm16.00"2880x1800
88.6 %v7 (old)07 / 2023SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU1.6 kg17.1 mm16.00"2560x1600
89.4 %v7 (old)04 / 2023Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU1.8 kg16.5 mm16.00"2880x1800
保护套 -Galaxy Book 配有金属保护套 外壳设计与旧款相比没有变化 旧型号.深灰色的铝制外壳（月光石灰）非常高档，表面不仅反馈舒适，而且对指纹不敏感，易于清洁。不过，屏幕下边框较厚（1.7 厘米），有些影响整体外观。
Galaxy Book4 Ultra 在制造质量和稳定性方面都给人留下了良好的印象。键盘区域仅有轻微松动，整个底座具有抗扭转性。除此之外，没有任何吱吱嘎嘎的声音。显示屏盖本身要薄得多，同样也非常稳定。铰链调整得很好，基本能防止任何晃动，单手也能轻松打开盖子。最大开启角度为 135 度。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
从设备的厚度来看，Book4 Ultra 的屏幕边框也很厚，与同类产品相比占用空间最大。评测设备的高度为 16.5 毫米，重量为 1.82 千克，在同类产品中处于中等水平。随机附带的 140 瓦 PSU 又增加了 351 克的重量。
尺寸比较
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 DIN A4 ❌
功能 - 雷电 4 和 HDMI 2.1除了包括 Thunderbolt 4 在内的现代 USB-C 接口外，Galaxy Book4 Ultra 还提供一个普通 USB-A 端口和 HDMI 2.1。不过，其中一个 USB 接口还可用于供电。设备后部两侧的端口位置无可挑剔。HDMI 接口可直接连接到 Nvidia GPU，但两个 USB-C 接口均无法连接。使用外接显示器时，dGPU 并不总是自动同时运行。
左：HDMI 2.1、2 个 USB-C 4.0 和 Thunderbolt 4（40 GBit/s、DisplayPort ALT 模式、Power Delivery）
右：microSD 读卡器、USB-A 3.2 Gen.1（5 Gbit/s）、3.5 毫米音频插孔SD 读卡器在我们的测试中，右侧的 microSD 读卡器与我们的参考卡 Angelbird AV Pro V60 配对后的平均速度为 80 到 90 MB/s。不过，读卡器本身存在问题（弹簧装置），因为连接点位于机壳内部很深的位置，因此在没有工具/辅助工具的帮助下很难轻松安装或取出卡。
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
144.2 MB/s +83%Average of class Multimedia (19.3 - 198, n=43, last 2 years)
102.3 MB/s +30%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
78.8 MB/s Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Intel Core i9-13905H (PNY EliteX-Pro60 V60 256 GB)
78.1 MB/s -1%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Intel Core i7-13700H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
74 MB/s -6%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Intel Core i7-13700H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
23.3 MB/s -70%maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
237.2 MB/s +172%Average of class Multimedia (27.4 - 262, n=43, last 2 years)
144.8 MB/s +66%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
87.2 MB/s Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Intel Core i9-13905H (PNY EliteX-Pro60 V60 256 GB)
85.4 MB/s -2%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Intel Core i7-13700H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
83 MB/s -5%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Intel Core i7-13700H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
26.1 MB/s -70%
交流焊接 Wi-Fi 模块三星使用了我们熟悉的英特尔 AX211 模块，该模块支持 6 GHz 网络中的 Wi-Fi 6E 标准以及蓝牙 5.3。与华硕参考路由器配合使用，传输速度非常好且稳定。尽管如此，新的Galaxy Book4 Ultra 并不支持 Wi-Fi 7。
NetworkingSamsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1625 (min: 1476) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1715 (min: 1675) MBit/s ∼98%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1326 (min: 1246) MBit/s ∼77%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1439 (min: 1253) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1041 (min: 952) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1387 (min: 1348) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1300 (min: 942) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1284 (min: 1139) MBit/s ∼73%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1436 (min: 1342) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1381 (min: 1289) MBit/s ∼100%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1630 (min: 1571) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1687 (min: 1665) MBit/s ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1493 (min: 1452) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1638 (min: 1438) MBit/s ∼93%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 MaxBroadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1726 (min: 1684) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1752 (min: 1702) MBit/s ∼100%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1172 (min: 756) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1429 (min: 1235) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1227 (min: 1085) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1320 (min: 1256) MBit/s ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1625 (1476-1697) Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1715 (1675-1731)
网络摄像头1080p 网络摄像头没有任何变化，质量仍然一般。该设备缺少机械快门和用于人脸识别的红外模块。得益于 Meteor Lake 芯片的全新 NPU，网络摄像头的 Studio Effects（背景虚化、眼神接触、头部跟踪）可直接从操作系统中获得支持，无论使用何种应用程序。
4.2 ∆E7.3 ∆E7 ∆E6.1 ∆E4.6 ∆E5.8 ∆E7.9 ∆E5.4 ∆E7.1 ∆E4.3 ∆E7.2 ∆E5.1 ∆E3.4 ∆E8.3 ∆E9 ∆E4.6 ∆E7 ∆E8.2 ∆E6.9 ∆E9.7 ∆E10 ∆E8.7 ∆E6.6 ∆E10 ∆EColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra: 6.85 ∆E min: 3.37 - max: 10.03 ∆E
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
维护 橡胶脚垫下的隐藏式螺钉在设备的底座上，四颗螺丝隐藏在橡胶脚垫下。不过，即使没有螺丝，底盖也会被牢牢固定，因为中间还有额外的固定夹。在设备内部，你会看到风扇和大型蒸发腔。有两个用于 M.2 2280 固态硬盘的插槽，虽然旋入式电池可以更换，但所有其他组件都是焊接的。
内部设计
底盖输入设备 - 超大触摸板，普通键盘三星为Galaxy Book4 Ultra 配备了键盘和数字键盘。由于键程太浅，打字体验略有欠缺，而且按键时还会发出声音，与普通的Galaxy Book4 Pro 相比，敲击也不那么精确。在这方面，三星笔记本电脑也落后于竞争对手。经常打字的人应该先试试键盘。位于右上方的电源按钮同时也是指纹传感器。白色背光有三个强度级别，可以自动激活。
输入设备
键盘照明 在巨大的触控板（15.1 x 10.8 厘米）上做出的轻扫手势非常好，尽管触控板的位置偏左。在打字时，左手的球几乎总是在触摸板上，但在测试过程中这并没有成为问题。触摸板的下部可以点击，但这样做的代价是发出相对响亮和廉价的噪音。
显示屏 - 120 Hz AMOLED子像素结构三星只销售配备 16 英寸 OLED 触摸屏（2880 x 1800 像素，16:10）的Galaxy Book4 Ultra。主观画质色彩鲜艳、黑色深邃，给人留下深刻印象。响应速度极快，支持 HDR 内容。此外，由于采用了 120 Hz 的刷新率，移动非常流畅。与所有 Windows 设备一样，HDR 模式可以手动激活，但不再提供色彩管理功能。亮度和色温均可通过传感器自动调节。
SDR 模式的最大亮度平均为 393 cd/m²，黑色值为 0 cd/m²，对比度非常高。我们测得图像部分的 HDR 亮度为 564 cd/m²，而几乎全白图像的 HDR 亮度为 540 cd/m²。这意味着，与微型 LED 面板相比，HDR 功能明显受到限制，再加上更好的 macOS 处理能力，MacBook Pro 1600 的 HDR 功能将更加出色。 MacBook Pro 16在 HDR 方面要优越得多。
394cd/m²393cd/m²397cd/m²388cd/m²390cd/m²395cd/m²391cd/m²393cd/m²397cd/m²
Distribution of brightnessATNA60CL07-0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2Maximum: 397 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 393.1 cd/m² Minimum: 3.7 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 98 %Center on Battery: 389 cd/m²Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.4 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.83}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.1 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}88.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)99.9% sRGB (Argyll 3D)98.6% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)Gamma: 2.27CCT: 6431 K
Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraATNA60CL07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16"Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2Samsung ATNA60YV04-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16"Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8LEN160-3.2K, Mini-LED, 3200x2000, 16"SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Samsung ATNA60CL03-0, AMOLED, 2880x1800, 16"Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 MaxMini-LED, 3456x2234, 16"HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Samsung SDC41A6, OLED, 2880x1800, 16"Display3%-3%-17%3%1%3% Display P3 Coverage98.699.7 1%95.1 -4%68.8 -30%99.9 1%99.2 1%99.6 1% sRGB Coverage99.9100 0%99.9 0%98.8 -1%100 0%100 0% AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage88.596.7 9%84.6 -4%70 -21%96.3 9%96.7 9%Response Times-209%-1863%-1756%8%-9254%-35% Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *0.54 ?(0.29, 0.25)1.86 ?(0.96, 0.9) -244%14 ?(7.4, 6.6) -2493%13.7 ?(6.7, 7) -2437%0.49 ?(0.26, 0.23) 9%66.9 ?(29.4, 37.5) -12289%0.78 ?(0.44, 0.34) -44% Response Time Black / White *0.69 ?(0.39, 0.3)1.89 ?(0.89, 1) -174%9.2 ?(2.2, 7) -1233%8.1 ?(3.8, 4.3) -1074%0.65 ?(0.37, 0.28) 6%43.6 ?(13.6, 30) -6219%0.86 ?(0.4, 0.46) -25% PWM Frequency240 ?(100)60 ?(100)5784 ?(100)240 ?(100)14877480 ?(100)Screen-4%-117%-77%-25%22%-16%Brightness middle390390.1 0%627.4 61%384 -2%400 3%630 62%385.2 -1%Brightness393393 0%618 57%371 -6%399 2%604 54%387 -2%Brightness Distribution9897 -1%95 -3%88 -10%93 -5%94 -4%99 1%Black Level *0.190.30.03Colorchecker dE 2000 *1.41.41 -1%5.84 -317%3.4 -143%2.3 -64%1.2 14%1.73 -24%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *2.73.43 -27%10.22 -279%9.2 -241%4.15 -54%2.8 -4%3.95 -46%Greyscale dE 2000 *2.12 5%6.7 -219%3.4 -62%2.7 -29%1.9 10%2.6 -24%Gamma2.27 97%2.22 99%2.77 79%2.16 102%2.266 97%2.29 96%2.17 101%CCT6431 101%6324 103%5795 112%7462 87%7047 92%6812 95%6133 106%Contrast3302128013333Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *4.451.31.66Total Average (Program / Settings)-70% /
-39%-661% /
-403%-617% /
-366%-5% /
-11%-3077% /
-2042%-16% /
-14%* ... smaller is better
卡尔曼灰度（模式：鲜艳，目标色彩空间：P3）
CalMAN 饱和度（模式：鲜艳，目标色彩空间：P3）
CalMAN ColorChecker（模式：鲜艳，目标色彩空间：P3）
卡尔曼灰度（模式：P3，目标色彩空间：P3）
CalMAN 饱和度（模式：P3，目标色彩空间：P3）
CalMAN ColorChecker（模式：P3，目标色彩空间：P3）在三星的设置应用中，有多种色彩配置文件，标准的活动配置文件是 "鲜艳"。像往常一样，这里的色彩有点过度饱和，这让图像显得更加鲜艳。不过，开箱即用的 P3 模式也能提供大部分准确的色彩，我们就是使用这种模式进行测量的。通过自己的校准，我们无法进一步改善这一性能。该面板完全覆盖了 sRGB 和 P3 色彩空间，喜欢编辑图像的人会对同样精确的 sRGB 模式感到满意。
CalMAN 灰度（模式：sRGB，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
CalMAN 饱和度（模式：sRGB，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
CalMAN ColorChecker（模式：sRGB，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
对比 sRGB
对 P3
对比 AdobeRGB
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White0.69 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.39 ms rise↘ 0.3 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey0.54 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.29 ms rise↘ 0.25 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms).
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 Hz ≤ 100 % brightness settingThe display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.
The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8327 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
PWM (0 % 亮度)
PWM (20 % 亮度)
PWM (40 % 亮度)
PWM (60 % 亮度)
PWM (80 % 亮度)
PWM (100 % 亮度)
室外（多云）
在阳光下
OLED 触摸屏基本上是反光的，但由于采用了康宁大猩猩玻璃 DX，其反光程度低于其他光面面板，在这方面，三星与Apple 的 MacBook 不相上下。原则上，只要避免光源的反射，你也可以在明亮的户外使用该设备。可视角度的稳定性非常好，但如果偏差较大，你会发现典型的 OLED 蓝色光泽。
视角稳定性性能 - 流星湖取代猛禽湖三星用新的流星湖处理器取代了旧的英特尔猛禽湖芯片，您可以获得 酷睿至尊 7 155H或 酷睿至尊 9 185H.无论采用哪种处理器，您都将获得 16 或 32 GB 的焊接内存，在 GPU 方面，您可以选择 GeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑或速度更快的 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑.
测试条件在三星设置应用中，有多种能源配置文件，但标准选择是 "优化"模式。我们也使用该模式进行了以下基准测试和测量。您还可以选择静音 模式或高性能模式。我们在下表中总结了相应的 TDP/TGP 值。
能源概况
CPU TDP
R23 Multi
GPU TGP
Time Spy 图形
压力测试
赛博朋克 2077
1080p Ultra
最大风扇强度
静音
35/25 瓦
11,327 点
55 瓦
1,529 点
CPU：20 瓦
GPU：20 瓦
12fps
32 dB(A)
优化后
65/40 瓦
15,342 分
55 瓦
6,073 分
CPU：25 瓦
GPU：33 瓦
39.4fps
41.7 dB(A)
高性能
80/70 瓦
17,088 分
80 瓦
7,849 分
CPU：30 瓦
GPU：80 瓦
55.4fps
51.3 dB(A)
处理器酷睿至尊 7 155H Core Ultra 7 155H的继任者 酷睿 i7-13700H的继任者，总共提供 16 个内核/22 个线程（6 倍性能，10 倍效率）。该处理器的功耗限制为 65/40 瓦，即使与老一代 Raptor Lake 处理器相比几乎没有任何差异，也能提供不错的性能。这意味着它并不值得升级。使用 Ryzen 9 Pro 7940HS，AMD 稍稍领先。普通的 M3 Pro也处于这一水平，在单核测试中占据优势。在持续负载下，多核性能下降了约 15%。在电池模式下，处理器的最大功耗为 45 瓦，因此性能下降了 7%。其他 CPU 基准测试可在 技术部分.
Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2195 (2134.59-2575.83) Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS: Ø2620 (2534.21-2717.95) Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 12-Core: Ø2163 (2149.84-2169.2) Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Intel Core i9-13905H: Ø2742 (2611.14-2856.94) SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø2126 (2076.41-2253.14) Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø1739 (1422.32-2515.18) HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø1705 (1414.83-2302.95)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core) Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU 7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1 Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean CPU Performance Rating
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 -2! Intel Core i9-13905H
82.6 pt Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro -8! Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
81.1 pt Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
75.7 pt Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
70.5 pt SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) -2! Intel Core i7-13700H
69.5 pt HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 -1! Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
69.1 pt Average of class Multimedia
69.1 pt Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
67 pt Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 -2! Intel Core i7-13700H
65.9 pt Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Intel Core i9-13905H
20034 (17303.9min - 20033.7max) Points +28%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
16938 (16164.3min - 16938.4max) Points +8%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
15698 Points Average of class Multimedia (4861 - 30783, n=80, last 2 years)
15531 Points -1%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Intel Core i7-13700H
15306 Points -2%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
15154 (13865.9min - 15153.6max) Points -3%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 12-Core
15106 Points -4%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (9769 - 19007, n=52)
14965 Points -5%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Intel Core i7-13700H
14760 Points -6%Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Intel Core i9-13905H
2020 Points +13%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 12-Core
1977 Points +11%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Intel Core i7-13700H
1885 Points +5%Average of class Multimedia (1128 - 2290, n=72, last 2 years)
1821 Points +2%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
1794 Points 0%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
1789 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1496 - 1815, n=52)
1726 Points -4%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1708 Points -5%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Intel Core i7-13700H
1698 Points -5%Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Intel Core i9-13905H
7469 Points +23%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
6601 Points +8%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
6085 Points Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Intel Core i7-13700H
5926 Points -3%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3798 - 7409, n=50)
5795 Points -5%Average of class Multimedia (1887 - 11924, n=64, last 2 years)
5742 Points -6%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Intel Core i7-13700H
5672 Points -7%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5609 Points -8%Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Intel Core i9-13905H
775 Points +12%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Intel Core i7-13700H
729 Points +5%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
695 Points 0%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
693 Points Average of class Multimedia (420 - 853, n=64, last 2 years)
670 Points -3%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (601 - 696, n=50)
665 Points -4%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
663 Points -4%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Intel Core i7-13700H
657 Points -5%Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Intel Core i9-13905H
2857 (2611.14min - 2856.94max) Points +11%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2718 (2534.21min - 2717.95max) Points +6%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
2576 (2134.59min - 2575.83max) Points Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Intel Core i7-13700H
2515 Points -2%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1932 - 2880, n=56)
2449 Points -5%Average of class Multimedia (856 - 5224, n=71, last 2 years)
2449 Points -5%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2303 (1414.83min - 2302.95max) Points -11%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Intel Core i7-13700H
2253 (2076.41min - 2253.14max) Points -13%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 12-Core
2163 (2149.84min, 2151.26P1 - 2169.2max) Points -16%Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Intel Core i9-13905H
285 Points +10%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
280 Points +8%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Intel Core i7-13700H
276 Points +7%Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=66, last 2 years)
263 Points +2%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
259 Points HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
255 Points -2%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (99.6 - 268, n=52)
249 Points -4%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Intel Core i7-13700H
246 Points -5%Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 12-Core
327 Seconds * -49%Average of class Multimedia (100 - 557, n=65, last 2 years)
262 Seconds * -19%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (175 - 381, n=47)
233 Seconds * -6%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Intel Core i7-13700H
223 Seconds * -1%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Intel Core i7-13700H
221 Seconds * -0%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
220 Seconds * Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
191 Seconds * +13%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Intel Core i9-13905H
173 Seconds * +21%7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Intel Core i9-13905H
76332 MIPS +22%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
67813 MIPS +8%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
62513 MIPS SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Intel Core i7-13700H
61921 MIPS -1%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Intel Core i7-13700H
60842 MIPS -3%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
60099 MIPS -4%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (41739 - 70254, n=50)
59108 MIPS -5%Average of class Multimedia (29095 - 130368, n=59, last 2 years)
58499 MIPS -6%7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Intel Core i7-13700H
6224 MIPS +12%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
6215 MIPS +12%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Intel Core i9-13905H
6069 MIPS +10%Average of class Multimedia (3666 - 7545, n=59, last 2 years)
5718 MIPS +3%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
5540 MIPS Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Intel Core i7-13700H
5510 MIPS -1%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (4594 - 5621, n=50)
5330 MIPS -4%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5125 MIPS -7%Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 12-Core
15480 Points +24%Average of class Multimedia (4983 - 25760, n=77, last 2 years)
13511 Points +8%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
13028 Points +4%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
12517 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (7732 - 13656, n=55)
12275 Points -2%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
11962 Points -4%Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 12-Core
3138 Points +29%Average of class Multimedia (1534 - 3927, n=73, last 2 years)
2702 Points +11%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2605 Points +7%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
2436 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1901 - 2473, n=52)
2377 Points -2%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2288 Points -6%Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 12-Core
15298 Points +23%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Intel Core i9-13905H
14999 Points +20%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
12463 Points Average of class Multimedia (4652 - 23059, n=63, last 2 years)
12189 Points -2%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12053 Points -3%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
12038 Points -3%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (10017 - 13556, n=52)
12016 Points -4%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Intel Core i7-13700H
11808 Points -5%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Intel Core i7-13700H
11497 Points -8%Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 12-Core
2327 Points +28%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Intel Core i9-13905H
1966 Points +8%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
1956 Points +7%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Intel Core i7-13700H
1885 Points +3%Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2555, n=63, last 2 years)
1882 Points +3%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
1824 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1462 - 1824, n=52)
1751 Points -4%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1731 Points -5%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Intel Core i7-13700H
1692 Points -7%HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Intel Core i9-13905H
22.9 fps +34%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
20.4 fps +19%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
17.1 fps Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Intel Core i7-13700H
16.8 fps -2%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Intel Core i7-13700H
16.6 fps -3%Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 34.3, n=59, last 2 years)
16.6 fps -3%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (9.93 - 21.2, n=50)
16.5 fps -4%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
16.4 fps -4%LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Multimedia (23.9 - 146.7, n=60, last 2 years)
50.3 s * -8%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Intel Core i7-13700H
49.6 s * -6%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (37.5 - 79.2, n=49)
49.6 s * -6%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Intel Core i7-13700H
47.6 s * -2%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
46.6 s * Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
46.1 s * +1%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
45.3 s * +3%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Intel Core i9-13905H
42.8 s * +8%R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.4907 sec * -5%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Intel Core i7-13700H
0.489 sec * -4%Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=59, last 2 years)
0.4825 sec * -3%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (0.4457 - 0.53, n=49)
0.4817 sec * -3%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.4682 sec * Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
0.4514 sec * +4%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Intel Core i7-13700H
0.434 sec * +7%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Intel Core i9-13905H
0.4178 sec * +11%* ... smaller is better
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit2576 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit177.7 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit259 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)6085 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)693 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core1789 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core15698 Points
Help... in comparison
Performance Rating: Percent AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx Performance Rating
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon RX 6550M
95.9 pt Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
83.7 pt Average of class Multimedia
68.3 pt Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
67.1 pt HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
66.8 pt Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
66.4 pt Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
65.5 pt SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
65.3 pt AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon RX 6550M
27411 KRay/s +102%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
17986 KRay/s +33%Average of class Multimedia (5121 - 50388, n=58, last 2 years)
15771 KRay/s +16%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
14049 KRay/s +4%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
13917 KRay/s +3%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
13541 KRay/s SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
13486 KRay/s 0%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6670 - 18470, n=50)
13121 KRay/s -3%AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon RX 6550M
116960 Points +63%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
92135 Points +28%Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 201874, n=59, last 2 years)
75254 Points +5%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
72948 Points +2%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
71791 Points SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
70104 Points -2%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (40905 - 93181, n=50)
69689 Points -3%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
69259 Points -4%AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon RX 6550M
4944 MB/s +52%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
4296 MB/s +32%Average of class Multimedia (1188 - 8623, n=59, last 2 years)
3524 MB/s +8%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
3360 MB/s +3%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
3251 MB/s Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1940 - 4436, n=50)
3249 MB/s 0%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
3247 MB/s 0%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
3200 MB/s -2%AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon RX 6550M
124565 Points +48%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
117697 Points +40%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
100136 Points +19%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
99961 Points +19%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
84280 Points Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 181505, n=59, last 2 years)
84041 Points 0%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (64698 - 94181, n=50)
83035 Points -1%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
81755 Points -3%AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon RX 6550M
15304 Points +58%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
11328 Points +17%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
9696 Points HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
9622 Points -1%Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 28794, n=59, last 2 years)
9592 Points -1%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (5639 - 10647, n=50)
9134 Points -6%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
9065 Points -7%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
8982 Points -7%AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon RX 6550M
62357 Points +79%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
44667 Points +28%Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 105740, n=58, last 2 years)
37480 Points +8%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
35607 Points +2%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
34862 Points Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
34531 Points -1%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (18236 - 47685, n=50)
33893 Points -3%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
33488 Points -4%AIDA64 / CPU AES
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon RX 6550M
88705 MB/s +30%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
86469 MB/s +27%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (45713 - 152179, n=50)
77255 MB/s +13%Average of class Multimedia (26066 - 169946, n=59, last 2 years)
72098 MB/s +6%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
68741 MB/s +1%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
68288 MB/s Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
67264 MB/s -1%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
66616 MB/s -2%AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
1234 MB/s +27%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon RX 6550M
1079 MB/s +11%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
997 MB/s +3%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
996 MB/s +3%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
968 MB/s Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (557 - 1250, n=50)
962 MB/s -1%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
948 MB/s -2%Average of class Multimedia (440 - 2022, n=59, last 2 years)
946 MB/s -2%AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon RX 6550M
14590 KRay/s +106%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
9873 KRay/s +39%Average of class Multimedia (2759 - 26875, n=59, last 2 years)
8619 KRay/s +22%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
7496 KRay/s +6%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
7241 KRay/s +2%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
7240 KRay/s +2%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
7087 KRay/s Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3569 - 9802, n=50)
6871 KRay/s -3%AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
52520 MPixel/s +3%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
50926 MPixel/s HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
48831 MPixel/s -4%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
48148 MPixel/s -5%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32719 - 54223, n=50)
46707 MPixel/s -8%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
44545 MPixel/s -13%Average of class Multimedia (12860 - 65787, n=59, last 2 years)
43274 MPixel/s -15%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon RX 6550M
37800 MPixel/s -26%
系统性能在合成基准测试中，Galaxy Book4 Ultra 表现出色，是一款速度快、反应灵敏的电脑。在测试过程中，我们没有发现任何问题。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness WebXPRT 3: Overall WebXPRT 4: Overall Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2Radeon RX 6550M, R9 PRO 7940HS, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
7777 Points +12%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13905H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7674 Points +10%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
7368 Points +6%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
6973 Points Average of class Multimedia (4325 - 8670, n=55, last 2 years)
6831 Points -2%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (6537 - 6973, n=5)
6825 Points -2%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
6822 Points -2%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
6720 Points -4%PCMark 10 / Essentials
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2Radeon RX 6550M, R9 PRO 7940HS, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
11483 Points +10%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13905H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11320 Points +8%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
10753 Points +3%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
10544 Points +1%Average of class Multimedia (8025 - 12420, n=55, last 2 years)
10462 Points 0%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
10446 Points HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
10326 Points -1%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (9463 - 10446, n=5)
10145 Points -3%PCMark 10 / Productivity
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2Radeon RX 6550M, R9 PRO 7940HS, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
10046 Points +10%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13905H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9710 Points +6%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
9511 Points +4%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
9272 Points +1%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
9152 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (8769 - 9272, n=5)
9071 Points -1%Average of class Multimedia (6763 - 10615, n=55, last 2 years)
8902 Points -3%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
8578 Points -6%PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13905H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11156 Points +16%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2Radeon RX 6550M, R9 PRO 7940HS, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
11064 Points +15%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
10691 Points +11%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
9624 Points Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
9527 Points -1%Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 15187, n=55, last 2 years)
9470 Points -2%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (8602 - 10622, n=5)
9407 Points -2%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
8602 Points -11%CrossMark / Overall
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProM3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z
1977 Points +14%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1896 Points +9%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13905H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1774 Points +2%Average of class Multimedia (866 - 2255, n=65, last 2 years)
1746 Points 0%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1740 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (1552 - 1740, n=5)
1648 Points -5%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1574 Points -10%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1569 Points -10%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2Radeon RX 6550M, R9 PRO 7940HS, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
1555 Points -11%CrossMark / Productivity
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1822 Points +10%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProM3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z
1782 Points +7%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1659 Points Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2050, n=65, last 2 years)
1651 Points 0%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13905H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1650 Points -1%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (1459 - 1659, n=5)
1555 Points -6%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1496 Points -10%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2Radeon RX 6550M, R9 PRO 7940HS, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
1488 Points -10%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1479 Points -11%CrossMark / Creativity
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProM3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z
2424 Points +26%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13905H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2082 Points +8%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2012 Points +4%Average of class Multimedia (907 - 2795, n=65, last 2 years)
1975 Points +2%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1930 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (1811 - 1943, n=5)
1885 Points -2%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1831 Points -5%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2Radeon RX 6550M, R9 PRO 7940HS, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
1714 Points -11%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1691 Points -12%CrossMark / Responsiveness
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1789 Points +22%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1495 Points +2%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1467 Points Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProM3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z
1466 Points 0%Average of class Multimedia (605 - 2094, n=65, last 2 years)
1439 Points -2%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13905H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1368 Points -7%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2Radeon RX 6550M, R9 PRO 7940HS, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
1325 Points -10%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (1167 - 1467, n=5)
1315 Points -10%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1167 Points -20%WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProM3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z
427 Points +52%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13905H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
336 Points +20%Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 545, n=67, last 2 years)
326 Points +16%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2Radeon RX 6550M, R9 PRO 7940HS, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
315 Points +12%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
301 Points +7%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
281 Points HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
278 Points -1%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (262 - 285, n=5)
277 Points -1%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
237 Points -16%WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13905H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
288 Points +12%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
274 Points +6%Average of class Multimedia (167.3 - 353, n=60, last 2 years)
274 Points +6%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
258 Points Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2Radeon RX 6550M, R9 PRO 7940HS, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
255 Points -1%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
255 Points -1%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (247 - 260, n=5)
255 Points -1%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
208 Points -19%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
552 ms * -33%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2Radeon RX 6550M, R9 PRO 7940HS, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
546 ms * -31%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
537 ms * -29%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (416 - 561, n=5)
512 ms * -23%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
494 ms * -19%Average of class Multimedia (254 - 835, n=72, last 2 years)
482 ms * -16%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13905H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
465 ms * -12%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
416.4 ms * Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProM3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z
376.2 ms * +10%* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score
6973 pointsHelp
AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
90918 MB/s HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
84352 MB/s -7%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (62397 - 96791, n=50)
82943 MB/s -9%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
79890 MB/s -12%Average of class Multimedia (21158 - 108302, n=59, last 2 years)
75322 MB/s -17%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
71912 MB/s -21%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon RX 6550M
66740 MB/s -27%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
65071 MB/s -28%AIDA64 / Memory Read
Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
89474 MB/s HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
86873 MB/s -3%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (60544 - 90647, n=50)
79969 MB/s -11%Average of class Multimedia (24312 - 125604, n=59, last 2 years)
76695 MB/s -14%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
73071 MB/s -18%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
70707 MB/s -21%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
69534 MB/s -22%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon RX 6550M
50398 MB/s -44%AIDA64 / Memory Write
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
93451 MB/s +23%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon RX 6550M
91516 MB/s +21%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
90954 MB/s +20%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
88988 MB/s +17%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
75813 MB/s Average of class Multimedia (24382 - 117933, n=59, last 2 years)
74141 MB/s -2%Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (58692 - 93451, n=50)
72670 MB/s -4%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
67041 MB/s -12%AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (116.2 - 233, n=50)
143.2 ns * -1%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
141.4 ns * HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
138.4 ns * +2%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon RX 6550M
121.3 ns * +14%Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=59, last 2 years)
113.7 ns * +20%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
103.9 ns * +27%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
97.5 ns * +31%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
84.2 ns * +40%* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟在我们的标准化延迟测试（上网、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载）中，评测设备及其当前的 BIOS 版本表现非常出色。一个驱动程序确实出现了峰值，但重要的 "中断到处理延迟 "值非常低。
LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
6156.4 μs * -932%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4545.9 μs * -662%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13905H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1428.9 μs * -140%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2Radeon RX 6550M, R9 PRO 7940HS, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
1253.5 μs * -110%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
893 μs * -50%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
596.3 μs * * ... smaller is better
大容量存储器不出所料，三星安装了自己的一款固态硬盘（PM9A1），但容量只有 512 GB。首次安装后，用户只能使用 403 GB。至少，由于有了第二个 M.2 2280 插槽，存储容量可以轻松、经济地扩展。固态硬盘的性能无可挑剔，即使在长时间负载的情况下，性能也不会下降。其他固态硬盘基准测试 在此列出.
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpdSamsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQCDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
6862 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
5123 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
613 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
400 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
77.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
164 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8:
1679 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8:
2248 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpdSamsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQSequential Read:
5351MB/s
Sequential Write:
3925MB/s
4K Read:
65.3MB/s
4K Write:
153.2MB/s
4K-64 Read:
1813MB/s
4K-64 Write:
2916MB/s
Access Time Read:
0.033ms
Access Time Write:
0.027ms
Copy ISO:
3554.71MB/s
Copy Program:
1074.47MB/s
Copy Game:
2283.34MB/s
Score Read:
2413Points
Score Write:
3462Points
Score Total:
7043Points
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpdSamsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQDiskSpd seq_q8t1_read:
5759MB/s
DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write:
5032MB/s
DiskSpd seq_read:
3712MB/s
DiskSpd seq_write:
4152MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read:
2181MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write:
3101MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read:
78.3MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write:
164.2MB/s
DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read:
5690MB/s
Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD Drive Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
95.8 pt Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraSamsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
77 pt Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
70.7 pt Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
66.8 pt Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
66.7 pt Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
55.9 pt Average of class Multimedia
55.2 pt HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
53.7 pt DiskSpd
seq readHP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
4195 (3890.22min - 4194.51max) MB/s +13%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4007 (3969.31min - 4006.77max) MB/s +8%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraSamsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3712 (3688.85min - 3711.75max) MB/s Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
3654 (3592.99min - 3653.69max) MB/s -2%Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (1472 - 4572, n=39)
3501 MB/s -6%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3077 (2170.13min - 3076.66max) MB/s -17%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3005 (2951.71min - 3004.87max) MB/s -19%Average of class Multimedia (453 - 4432, n=59, last 2 years)
2907 MB/s -22% seq writeSCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5155 (4427.3min - 5155.43max) MB/s +24%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraSamsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4152 (3343.49min - 4151.61max) MB/s Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
3877 (3771.73min - 3876.79max) MB/s -7%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3530 (3501.32min - 3530max) MB/s -15%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3327 (3035.64min - 3327.13max) MB/s -20%Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (1148 - 4434, n=39)
3289 MB/s -21%Average of class Multimedia (384 - 5711, n=59, last 2 years)
3123 MB/s -25%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2569 (1593.04min - 2568.7max) MB/s -38% seq q8 t1 readHP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
7152 (6200.23min - 7151.67max) MB/s +24%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
7121 (6367.95min - 7120.69max) MB/s +24%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
7002 (6363.24min - 7002.18max) MB/s +22%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
6601 (5818.24min - 6601.01max) MB/s +15%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6590 (5847.33min - 6590.33max) MB/s +14%Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (3387 - 6793, n=39)
6077 MB/s +6%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraSamsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
5759 (4945.05min - 5758.78max) MB/s Average of class Multimedia (467 - 7126, n=59, last 2 years)
5282 MB/s -8% seq q8 t1 writeSCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
6761 (6735.84min - 6761.33max) MB/s +34%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
5602 (5479.75min - 5601.7max) MB/s +11%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraSamsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
5032 (4977.28min - 5031.91max) MB/s Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4938 (4923.07min - 4938.16max) MB/s -2%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4886 (4877.24min - 4885.61max) MB/s -3%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
4542 (1615.35min - 4542.01max) MB/s -10%Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (1146 - 5091, n=39)
4428 MB/s -12%Average of class Multimedia (247 - 6898, n=59, last 2 years)
4099 MB/s -19% 4k q1 t1 readLenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
84.9 (82min - 84.93max) MB/s +8%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
83.7 (81.88min - 83.66max) MB/s +7%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraSamsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
78.3 (76.54min - 78.34max) MB/s Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (37.6 - 92.9, n=39)
71.9 MB/s -8%Average of class Multimedia (14.6 - 97.7, n=59, last 2 years)
61.4 MB/s -22%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
59.7 (57.49min - 59.7max) MB/s -24%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
57.1 (56.78min - 57.07max) MB/s -27%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
53.1 (52.47min - 53.13max) MB/s -32% 4k q1 t1 writeSCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
267 (266.37min - 267.43max) MB/s +63%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
214 (213.09min - 214.01max) MB/s +30%Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (125.7 - 241, n=39)
180.3 MB/s +10%Average of class Multimedia (44.4 - 378, n=59, last 2 years)
164.6 MB/s 0%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraSamsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
164.2 (156.89min - 164.15max) MB/s Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
153.1 (148.89min - 153.11max) MB/s -7%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
151.4 (148.6min - 151.39max) MB/s -8%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
77.7 (70.39min - 77.73max) MB/s -53% 4k q32 t16 readSCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4358 (4325.31min - 4358.41max) MB/s +100%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2518 (2508.69min - 2518.06max) MB/s +15%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraSamsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2181 (2156.61min - 2181.46max) MB/s Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (477 - 3426, n=39)
2058 MB/s -6%Average of class Multimedia (190.3 - 4881, n=59, last 2 years)
1334 MB/s -39%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
1105 (1023.06min - 1104.63max) MB/s -49%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1061 (1029.17min - 1061max) MB/s -51%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
353 (326.84min - 352.62max) MB/s -84% 4k q32 t16 writeSamsung Galaxy Book4 UltraSamsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3101 (2756.05min - 3100.73max) MB/s SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3090 (3060.74min - 3090.41max) MB/s 0%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2002 (1558.72min - 2002.2max) MB/s -35%Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (253 - 3567, n=39)
1535 MB/s -50%Average of class Multimedia (164.6 - 4074, n=59, last 2 years)
996 MB/s -68%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
508 (492.87min - 507.89max) MB/s -84%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
458 (428.82min - 457.64max) MB/s -85%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
148.5 (140.69min - 148.5max) MB/s -95%AS SSD
Score TotalSCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
9172 Points +30%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
7141 Points +1%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraSamsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
7043 Points Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (3573 - 8620, n=38)
5933 Points -16%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5928 Points -16%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
4894 Points -31%Average of class Multimedia (482 - 9972, n=56, last 2 years)
4778 Points -32%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
4395 Points -38% Score ReadSCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3369 Points +40%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2447 Points +1%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraSamsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2413 Points Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (1079 - 3224, n=38)
2099 Points -13%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1563 Points -35%Average of class Multimedia (192 - 3501, n=56, last 2 years)
1535 Points -36%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
1487 Points -38%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
953 Points -61% Score WriteSCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4082 Points +18%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3659 Points +6%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3504 Points +1%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraSamsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3462 Points HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
3036 Points -12%Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (1258 - 4036, n=38)
2819 Points -19%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
2751 Points -21%Average of class Multimedia (191 - 4684, n=56, last 2 years)
2514 Points -27% Seq ReadHP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
5353.82 MB/s 0%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraSamsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
5351 MB/s Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5193.44 MB/s -3%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5128 MB/s -4%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
4846.38 MB/s -9%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4685.43 MB/s -12%Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (2629 - 5546, n=38)
4658 MB/s -13%Average of class Multimedia (484 - 5730, n=56, last 2 years)
4212 MB/s -21% Seq WriteSCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5101 MB/s +30%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraSamsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3925 MB/s Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3440.79 MB/s -12%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
3349.41 MB/s -15%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2949.16 MB/s -25%Average of class Multimedia (344 - 5651, n=56, last 2 years)
2830 MB/s -28%Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (1108 - 3925, n=38)
2766 MB/s -30%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
2533.8 MB/s -35% 4K ReadSCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
75.8 MB/s +16%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
75.62 MB/s +16%Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (39.2 - 85.1, n=38)
67.8 MB/s +4%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraSamsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
65.3 MB/s Average of class Multimedia (17.5 - 97.4, n=56, last 2 years)
59.7 MB/s -9%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
58.84 MB/s -10%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
57.42 MB/s -12%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
54.93 MB/s -16% 4K WriteSCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
231 MB/s +51%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
199.96 MB/s +31%Average of class Multimedia (43.1 - 328, n=56, last 2 years)
188.9 MB/s +23%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
186.47 MB/s +22%Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (105.4 - 216, n=38)
174.9 MB/s +14%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
168.76 MB/s +10%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
160.09 MB/s +4%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraSamsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
153.2 MB/s 4K-64 ReadSCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2780 MB/s +53%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1920.85 MB/s +6%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraSamsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1813 MB/s Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (533 - 2783, n=38)
1566 MB/s -14%Average of class Multimedia (125.7 - 2989, n=56, last 2 years)
1054 MB/s -42%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
967.82 MB/s -47%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
947.86 MB/s -48%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
358.94 MB/s -80% 4K-64 WriteSCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3341 MB/s +15%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3163.68 MB/s +8%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2973.32 MB/s +2%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraSamsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2916 MB/s HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2541 MB/s -13%Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (1010 - 3480, n=38)
2393 MB/s -18%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
2329.29 MB/s -20%Average of class Multimedia (75.2 - 3975, n=56, last 2 years)
2042 MB/s -30% Access Time ReadLenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
0.08 ms * -142%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
0.079 ms * -139%Average of class Multimedia (0.019 - 0.168, n=56, last 2 years)
0.05391 ms * -63%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
0.05 ms * -52%Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (0.023 - 0.089, n=37)
0.048 ms * -45%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.034 ms * -3%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraSamsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
0.033 ms * SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.018 ms * +45% Access Time WriteLenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
0.07 ms * -159%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
0.069 ms * -156%Average of class Multimedia (0.014 - 0.754, n=56, last 2 years)
0.06859 ms * -154%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.06 ms * -122%Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (0.02 - 0.076, n=38)
0.03368 ms * -25%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraSamsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
0.027 ms * Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
0.023 ms * +15%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.017 ms * +37%* ... smaller is better
Continuous Performance Read : DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5690 (5289.86-5704.67)
图形卡GPU-ZGeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑在日常情况下，集成的 Arc GPU 负责图形计算，而在要求较高的应用中，Nvidia GPU 会自动开启。使用普通 Optimus 图形切换器，但不提供 MUX 切换器或高级 Optimus。笔记本电脑 RTX 4050 笔记本电脑Galaxy Book4 Ultra 内安装的 RTX 4050 笔记本电脑在高性能模式下的最大功耗为 80 瓦，在优化模式下为 55 瓦。
基准测试结果与旧款 Galaxy Book3 Ultra同样使用 RTX 4050 笔记本电脑，功耗为 55 瓦。这比 Radeon RX 6550M但 M3 Pro GPU 有时更快。对于多媒体笔记本电脑来说，RTX 4050 笔记本电脑仍然是一个不错的选择。不过，Galaxy Book4 Ultra 未能通过 3DMark 压力测试 (Time Spy) ，在持续负载下性能下降了 7%。
在电池模式下，Nvidia GPU 的最大功耗为 35 瓦，因此 GPU 性能降低了约 13%。 其他 GPU 基准测试 这里.
3DMark 11 | 3DMark | Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.4 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
40870 Points +84%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13905H
30310 Points +36%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (13339 - 32642, n=41)
28461 Points +28%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
24603 Points +11%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
22469 Points +1%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
22216 Points Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Radeon RX 6550M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
20506 Points -8%Average of class Multimedia (3765 - 45564, n=58, last 2 years)
18949 Points -15%3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike GraphicsSCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
29801 Points +78%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13905H
21212 Points +27%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (13591 - 24007, n=39)
21010 Points +26%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
17908 Points +7%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
16735 Points Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
16174 Points -3%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Radeon RX 6550M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
14696 Points -12%Average of class Multimedia (2328 - 34440, n=61, last 2 years)
13673 Points -18%2560x1440 Time Spy GraphicsSCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
11496 Points +89%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13905H
8299 Points +37%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (5107 - 9040, n=39)
7751 Points +28%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
6941 Points +14%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
6073 Points Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
5859 Points -4%Average of class Multimedia (696 - 13010, n=62, last 2 years)
5245 Points -14%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Radeon RX 6550M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
4546 Points -25% Wild Life Extreme UnlimitedSCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
21612 Points +81%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
14545 Points +22%Average of class Multimedia (3164 - 37434, n=28, last 2 years)
14210 Points +19%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (9394 - 16529, n=9)
13655 Points +14%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
11948 Points Geekbench 5.5 - OpenCL Score
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
108736 Points +59%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
83239 Points +22%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (63538 - 90075, n=38)
82463 Points +20%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13905H
79927 Points +17%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
71151 Points +4%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
68509 Points Average of class Multimedia (11562 - 143050, n=62, last 2 years)
57048 Points -17%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
52441 Points -23%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Radeon RX 6550M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
33902 Points -51%Geekbench 6.4 - GPU OpenCL
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (60815 - 86892, n=21)
77854 Points +28%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
75318 Points +24%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
60815 Points Average of class Multimedia (9994 - 125058, n=70, last 2 years)
52258 Points -14%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
50373 Points -17%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Radeon RX 6550M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
30568 Points -50%
3DMark 11 Performance
21479 points3DMark Fire Strike Score
14587 points3DMark Time Spy Score
6449 pointsHelp... in comparison
Blender: v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | v3.3 Classroom CUDA | v3.3 Classroom METAL | v3.3 Classroom CPU Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average of class Multimedia (19 - 105, n=27, last 2 years)
42 Seconds * -31%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
34 Seconds * -6%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
32 Seconds * HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
31 Seconds * +3%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (25 - 37, n=39)
29 Seconds * +9%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13905H
26 Seconds * +19%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
23 Seconds * +28%Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Multimedia (32 - 164, n=26, last 2 years)
66.7 Seconds * -19%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
61 Seconds * -9%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
56 Seconds * HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
54 Seconds * +4%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (47 - 68, n=39)
53.1 Seconds * +5%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13905H
52 Seconds * +7%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
35 Seconds * +37%Blender / v3.3 Classroom METAL
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
69 Seconds * Average of class Multimedia (17.8 - 121, n=7, last 2 years)
56.3 Seconds * Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average of class Multimedia (160 - 1042, n=65, last 2 years)
435 Seconds * -14%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
397 Seconds * -4%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (243 - 907, n=40)
396 Seconds * -4%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
393 Seconds * -3%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
386 Seconds * -2%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
380 Seconds * Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
314 Seconds * +17%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13905H
306 Seconds * +19%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Radeon RX 6550M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
305 Seconds * +20%* ... smaller is better
游戏性能在Galaxy Book4 Ultra 的 OLED 显示屏上，游戏看起来非常棒，由于响应时间极短，即使是快节奏的射击游戏也能让人乐在其中。相比之下，在游戏性能方面，RTX 4050 笔记本不得不接受妥协，目前的游戏几乎无法以设备的原生分辨率运行。最理想的分辨率是全高清分辨率，一般来说，你希望以最高的细节来玩游戏。对于要求非常苛刻的游戏或光线追踪，就无法避免使用 DLSS 等升频技术。
Performance Rating | The Witcher 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11 Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
99.9 pt Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
86.8 pt HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
66.8 pt Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
65.6 pt Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
58.8 pt Average of class Multimedia
50 pt Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 -1! AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 6550M
47.5 pt The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
105.4 (100min, 100P1) fps +93%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
84.9 (80min) fps +56%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
62.7 (57min) fps +15%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
60.1 (51min) fps +10%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
54.5 (51min, 52P1) fps Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 6550M
49.4 (42min) fps -9%Average of class Multimedia (11 - 121, n=42, last 2 years)
49.2 fps -10%GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
96.8 (3.98min, 55.6P1) fps +43%SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
96.5 (4.91min, 66.7P1) fps +43%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
76.7 (12.6min, 52.6P1) fps +13%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
67.6 (4.78min, 43.5P1) fps Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
65.3 (21.8min, 35.7P1) fps -3%Average of class Multimedia (9.38 - 141.6, n=59, last 2 years)
50 fps -26%Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
109 fps +92%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
83.5 fps +47%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
68.6 fps +21%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
56.9 fps 0%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
56.7 fps Average of class Multimedia (7.61 - 132, n=62, last 2 years)
48.3 fps -15%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 6550M
47.8 fps -16%Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
196.7 (34.8min, 146.3P1) fps +74%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
144.1 (27min, 110.8P1) fps +28%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
121.3 (49.1min, 95P1) fps +7%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
113 fps Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
103.9 (65min, 77.7P1) fps -8%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 6550M
88.4 (66.9min, 70.8P1) fps -22%Average of class Multimedia (13.3 - 247, n=63, last 2 years)
84.5 fps -25%Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
143.8 (126.1min) fps +13%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
138.6 (117min) fps +9%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
126.8 (108.1min) fps HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
106.4 (89.8min) fps -16%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 6550M
103 (86.2min) fps -19%Average of class Multimedia (29 - 179.9, n=63, last 2 years)
88.4 fps -30%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
73.5 (63.9min) fps -42%X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
109.7 fps +35%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
103.2 fps +27%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
81.5 fps Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
79 fps -3%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
69.7 fps -14%Average of class Multimedia (16.9 - 141.1, n=58, last 2 years)
58.3 fps -28%Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 6550M
33 fps -60%
The Witcher 3 | F1 23 | Far Cry 5 The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
105.4 (100min, 100P1) fps +93%Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
84.9 (80min) fps +56%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (18.5 - 94.7, n=40)
75.4 fps +38%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
62.7 (57min) fps +15%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
60.1 (51min) fps +10%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
54.5 (51min, 52P1) fps Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 6550M
49.4 (42min) fps -9%Average of class Multimedia (11 - 121, n=42, last 2 years)
49.2 fps -10%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU
43 fps -21%F1 23 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (25.7 - 60.8, n=14)
43.2 fps +68%Average of class Multimedia (11 - 70.3, n=20, last 2 years)
30.2 fps +18%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
25.7 (10min, 19P1) fps Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
120 fps +50%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (50 - 127, n=24)
101.1 fps +26%HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
87 (64min) fps +9%Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
80 fps Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 6550M
79 (70min) fps -1%Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
71 (47min) fps -11%Average of class Multimedia (17 - 145, n=46, last 2 years)
63.1 fps -21%
Witcher 3 FPS diagram
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU: Ø54.5 (51-62)
CPU/GPUWitcher 3 数据（Ultra 设置）
lowmed.highultraQHDGTA V (2015)
142.8
67.6
48.1
The Witcher 3 (2015)
121
54.5
46
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)
162.2
147.6
141.3
126.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)
130.2
77.8
56.7
40.7
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)
122.4
104.2
81.5
Far Cry 5 (2018)
132
93
88
80
58
Strange Brigade (2018)
321
158
127
113
77
F1 23 (2023)
145.5
137
93.7
25.7
16.7
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023)
74.2
54.3
45.7
39.4
23.3
排放 - 每款车型均配备蒸发室噪音排放三星在Galaxy Book4 Ultra 的两款机型上都安装了带有两个风扇的蒸汽腔冷却系统，总体而言，它给人留下了非常深刻的印象。在执行简单任务时，风扇通常会完全关闭，在短时间内达到负载峰值时风扇也不会启动。在负载情况下，噪音会明显增大，但笔记本电脑的最大噪音为 41.7 dB(A)，即使不戴耳机也能忍受。相反，在高性能模式下达到 51 分贝（A）时，声音就会大得多。 评测设备中没有其他电子噪音
能耗曲线
3DMark 06
Witcher 3
赛博朋克 2077
压力测试
静音
36.2 dB(A)
36.2 dB(A)
36.2 dB(A)
32 dB(A)
优化型
37.9 dB(A)
41.7 dB(A)
41.7 dB(A)
41.7 dB(A)
高性能
41.7 dB(A)
50.5 dB(A)
51.3 dB(A)
51.3 dB(A)
Noise Level
Idle
24.2 / 24.2 / 24.2 dB(A)Load
37.9 / 41.7 dB(A)
30 dBsilent40 dB(A)audible50 dB(A)loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.2 dB(A)
Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQLenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2Radeon RX 6550M, R9 PRO 7940HS, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProM3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple SSD AP0512ZLenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13905H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLRHP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101NSCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TBSamsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQNoise-8%6%-3%11%-19%-5%off / environment *24.222.6 7%24.4 -1%22.7 6%23.3 4%25.9 -7%25 -3%Idle Minimum *24.222.9 5%24.4 -1%22.7 6%23.6 2%25.9 -7%26 -7%Idle Average *24.229.4 -21%24.4 -1%22.7 6%23.6 2%25.9 -7%27 -12%Idle Maximum *24.229.4 -21%24.4 -1%27.5 -14%23.6 2%32 -32%28 -16%Load Average *37.929.5 22%26.9 29%28.9 24%29.2 23%47.2 -25%40 -6%Witcher 3 ultra *41.752 -25%25.1 40%52.6 -26%32.1 23%53.1 -27%39 6%Load Maximum *41.752 -25%50.4 -21%52.5 -26%32.1 23%53.1 -27%41 2%* ... smaller is better
温度Galaxy Book4 Ultra 的金属外壳在闲置或运行简单任务时几乎不会发热。即使在压力测试中，表面温度也完全在限制范围内，因为我们在底座顶部测得的温度仅略低于 39 °C，而在底部后部中间区域测得的最高温度为 41.2 °C。这意味着您可以无限制地使用该设备。在压力测试中，处理器和显卡的功率很快就达到了 25/33 瓦。
CPU/GPU 压力测试数据
Max. LoadIdleWitcher 3
37.8 °C38.5 °C38.4 °C 35 °C36.8 °C36.9 °C 29 °C31.9 °C31.4 °C
Maximum: 38.5 °CAverage: 35.1 °C
39.8 °C41.2 °C38.3 °C34.3 °C38.3 °C32.3 °C31.2 °C32 °C30.1 °C
Maximum: 41.2 °CAverage: 35.3 °C Power Supply (max.) 47.1 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900Max. LoadIdleWitcher 3
23.5 °C23.4 °C23.3 °C 23.1 °C23.2 °C23 °C 23 °C23 °C23.2 °C
Maximum: 23.5 °CAverage: 23.2 °C
24 °C24 °C23.7 °C23.6 °C24.1 °C23.8 °C23.8 °C23.8 °C23.5 °C
Maximum: 24.1 °CAverage: 23.8 °C Power Supply (max.) 27.3 °C | Room Temperature 20.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900Max. LoadIdleWitcher 3
37.8 °C38.7 °C38.8 °C 34.7 °C37.1 °C36.5 °C 29.2 °C31 °C31.4 °C
Maximum: 38.8 °CAverage: 35 °C
40.8 °C41.3 °C38 °C32.6 °C39.2 °C31.5 °C31.3 °C31.4 °C30.1 °C
Maximum: 41.3 °CAverage: 35.1 °C Power Supply (max.) 47.9 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.2 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.9 °C / 89.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch. (-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-3.2 °C / -5.7 F).
应力测试表面温度（顶部）
应力测试表面温度（底部）
Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPULenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 6550MApple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPULenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPUHP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPUSCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPUSamsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPUHeat2%2%-17%-13%-19%-5%Maximum Upper Side *38.543 -12%38.1 1%37.8 2%39.6 -3%46.7 -21%41 -6%Maximum Bottom *41.241.6 -1%37 10%44.8 -9%39.2 5%54.1 -31%44 -7%Idle Upper Side *23.521.2 10%24.2 -3%30.6 -30%29 -23%26.5 -13%23 2%Idle Bottom *24.121.4 11%24.6 -2%31 -29%31.6 -31%26.8 -11%26 -8%* ... smaller is better
发言人 虽然总的来说，Galaxy Book4 Ultra 的音质还不错，但它无法与最好的 16 英寸多媒体笔记本电脑相媲美，例如 MacBook Pro, Yoga Pro 9i或 惠普 Spectre x360 16.特别是，在直接对比中，这些模块可以更突出一些。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.4% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (11.5% difference to median)Compared to same class» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 82% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%Compared to all devices tested» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.7 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(+) | good bass - only 2.8% away from median(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (7.3% difference to median)Compared to same class» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 95% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%Compared to all devices tested» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 5% lower than median(+) | bass is linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 1.2% away from median(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median(+) | highs are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (5.3% difference to median)Compared to same class» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%Compared to all devices tested» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.5 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.2% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (9.2% difference to median)Compared to same class» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 95% worse» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%Compared to all devices tested» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能量管理 - 增强耐力 耗电量在空闲运行时，OLED 显示屏显示本身非常经济，但三星的深色标准壁纸有所帮助。在游戏模式下，根据游戏内容的不同，功耗大约在 80 到 90 瓦之间，而在压力测试中，功耗曾短暂达到 125 瓦，之后又迅速降至 90 瓦。在高性能模式下，最大功耗为 141.6 瓦，之后为 128 瓦。这说明所提供的 140 瓦电源适配器大小合适。
Power Consumption
Off / Standby 0.24 / 0.52 WattIdle 4.8 / 7.5 / 7.9 Watt
Load
79.3 / 125 Watt
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraUltra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, OLED, 2880x1800, 16"Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon RX 6550M, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02, OLED, 3840x2400, 16"Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 12-Core, M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0512Z, Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.2"Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, Mini-LED, 3200x2000, 16"SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, AMOLED, 2880x1800, 16"Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU Average of class Multimedia Power Consumption-40%-25%-160%-54%11%-85%-21%Idle Minimum *4.87.5 -56%4.5 6%16 -233%8.6 -79%3 37%9.95 ?(2 - 24, n=33) -107%6.05 ?(2.1 - 31.3, n=67, last 2 years) -26%Idle Average *7.59.6 -28%16.5 -120%30 -300%12 -60%5 33%15.8 ?(5 - 62, n=33) -111%10.8 ?(4.6 - 38.3, n=67, last 2 years) -44%Idle Maximum *7.918.5 -134%16.7 -111%30.4 -285%12.4 -57%11 -39%20.1 ?(7.9 - 66.6, n=33) -154%12.7 ?(6 - 41.6, n=67, last 2 years) -61%Load Average *79.357.1 28%60.4 24%78.9 1%80 -1%72 9%88 ?(52.4 - 151, n=33) -11%67.8 ?(15.1 - 137, n=64, last 2 years) 15%Witcher 3 ultra *79.2115.8 -46%52.1 34%155.3 -96%147.7 -86%69.7 12%Load Maximum *125131.7 -5%102.9 18%180.4 -44%173.1 -38%108 14%176.3 ?(104.2 - 280, n=33) -41%111.7 ?(40 - 270, n=67, last 2 years) 11%* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø79.2 (74.4-84.5) Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø82.5 (73-125.3) Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø7.32 (5.81-11.4)
Power consumption with an external monitor
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø64.1 (57.9-91.8) Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø90.1 (89.4-90.7) Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø31.6 (27.2-44.5) Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø65.1 (51.9-90.4) Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø76.7 (70.6-85) Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø76 (72.8-82.7) Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø8.07 (6.96-10.1)
电池寿命设备打开时的充电时间 电池容量为 76 Wh，保持不变，但由于采用了新的 Meteor Lake 处理器，电池续航时间更长。 顺便提一下，我们只能在 120 Hz 的频率下进行电池测试，因为尽管在活动信号模式下选择了 60 Hz，但仍保持在 120 Hz。我们在Galaxy Book4 系列的其他机型上也发现了这个问题。
在 150 cd/m²（相当于评测设备最大 SDR 亮度的 66%）的 Wi-Fi 测试中，我们记录了将近 11 个小时，比前代产品长了将近 1.5 个小时。在全亮度条件下，Wi-Fi 测试持续了 7 个多小时。视频测试运行时间（同样为 150 cd/m²）从约 13.5 小时增加到近 18 小时。这就是全新 Meteor Lake 处理器及其低功耗内核的优势所在。
在负载情况下，大约 80 分钟就可以耗尽电池电量，全亮度 HDR 视频可播放约 5.5 小时。使用 140 瓦的 PSU 充电大约需要 2.5 小时，而且没有快速充电功能。
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
10h 56min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
7h 06min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
17h 56min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 18min
Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraUltra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 76 WhLenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon RX 6550M, 72 WhApple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 12-Core, M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, 99.6 WhLenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 75 WhHP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 83 WhSCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 80 WhSamsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 76 WhAverage of class Multimedia Battery Runtime-9%43%-40%1%-29%-0%9%H.26410761481 38%470 -56%803 -25%954 ?(498 - 1481, n=38, last 2 years) -11%WiFi v1.3656357 -46%1204 84%395 -40%660 1%467 -29%576 -12%694 ?(262 - 1204, n=67, last 2 years) 6%Load78101 29%83 6%77 -1%106 36%102.2 ?(50 - 209, n=42, last 2 years) 31%Reader / Idle61210931262 ?(612 - 2760, n=10, last 2 years)
Pros+ 优质外壳
+ 出色的 OLED 屏幕，色彩准确
+ 电池寿命长
+ 良好的系统性能
+ 2 个固态硬盘插槽
+ 有效的气室冷却
+ 雷电 4 和 HDMI 2.1Cons- 焊接 RAM
- PWM 不断闪烁
- 读卡器不稳定
- 无 Wi-Fi 7
结论 -Galaxy Book4 Ultra 仅有微小改进评论：SamsungGalaxy Book4 Ultra。评测设备由德国三星公司提供。从根本上说，三星为自己目前的Galaxy Book4 Ultra 带来了生活上的便利，因为这款 16 英寸的多媒体电脑已经获得了新的流星湖处理器，然而，除此之外，它还是和原来一样。有两种不同的配置和 酷睿至尊 7 155H和 GeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑评测变体适合作为多媒体机器。组件性能不错，各种能耗曲线也很均衡。此外，新的流星湖处理器还提高了电池续航时间。
120 Hz 的显示屏也提供了非常好的图像质量，各种色彩配置文件包括非常精确的 P3 和 sRGB 色彩空间配置文件。尽管如此，还是存在一些问题，如持续的 240 Hz PWM 闪烁，而且该设备的 HDR 功能也受到很大限制，尤其是与迷你 LED 竞争对手相比，如 联想 Yoga Pro 9i或 Apple MacBook Pro 16.
Galaxy Book4 Ultra 是一款非常出色的多媒体计算机，它将 AMOLED 显示屏与高级机壳结合在一起，机壳内有一个有效的蒸发腔，性能不错，电池续航时间长。遗憾的是，三星在内存和存储方面偷工减料。2399 美元只能获得 16GB 内存和 512GB 固态硬盘。
不过，它也存在一些缺点，比如底部边框过宽和采用焊接内存。特别是，在我们的评测配置中，16 GB 内存并不是特别宽裕。此外，键盘也很一般，主要原因是键程有限。
不过，最大的问题还是价格，三星为我们的 16GB 内存和 512GB SSD 评测机型开出了 2399 美元的高价。即使是配备 M3 Pro 和 HDR 功能明显更好的 MacBook Pro 16，在商店里也要便宜 200 美元左右。Windows 系统的竞争产品也更便宜，而且还有其他优势。联想 Yoga Pro 9i 提供了更好的键盘、更亮的迷你 LED 面板和更好的扬声器。申克公司的 Vision 16 Pro 仍然是一款非常便携的 16 英寸设备，配备速度更快的 RTX 4070 和无 PWM 的 IPS 面板。Galaxy Book4 Ultra 绝不是一款糟糕的机器，但考虑到这一细分市场上竞争设备的强劲实力，它的性价比并不是特别高，而且很快它就会在市场上迎来另一个竞争对手，那就是新款戴尔 XPS 16。
Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG
价格和供应情况 GalaxyBook4 Ultra 可以直接从三星公司订购，起价 2399 美元。
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
- 03/16/2024 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Chassis83 / 98 → 84%
Keyboard80%
Pointing Device86%
Connectivity68 / 80 → 85%
Weight65 / 20-72 → 87%
Battery90 / 95 → 94%
Display90%
Games Performance91 / 90 → 100%
Application Performance93 / 90 → 100%
Temperature91%
Noise93 / 95 → 98%
Audio88%
Camera44 / 85 → 52%
Average82%
90%
Multimedia - Weighted Average
More articles related to this deviceSamsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra (Galaxy Book4 Series)Review•三星Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 笔记本电脑评测... |Review•三星Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 评测--Cop... |Review•三星Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 评论--配备 O... |News•三星Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 太贵且内存仅限 ... |Review•Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 笔记本电脑评测： M... |Review•三星Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 - 配备酷睿U...
TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
Editor of the original article: Andrew Dickson - Translator - 145 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 582191 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:
Please share our article, every link counts!