判决小米 Pad Mini 是一款小巧、轻便、高品质的平板电脑，8.8 英寸的小巧金属外壳中装入了大量存储空间。它拥有明亮的 165 Hz 面板、快如闪电的 Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ 处理器和两个 USB-C 端口，与许多竞争对手相比，它能提供更多的功能。尤其是其主要竞争对手之一的Apple iPad Mini 7，在电池续航时间方面明显不如小米 Pad Mini。
Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG
Test device courtesy of Xiaomi
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
遗憾的是，这款小型小米平板电脑没有移动版，也没有 GPS 模块。我们希望小米 Pad Mini 能正式登陆欧洲，因为作为进口版本，它还有两个缺点：更新周期短于欧盟标准；根据进口商的不同，可能没有 24 个月的保修期。
Pros+ 轻巧、坚固、制作精良
+ 功能强大，支持 2x USB-C
+ 电池寿命长
+ 快速 SoC
+ 明亮的 165 Hz 屏幕
+ 3K 分辨率
+ 高达 512 GB 的存储空间Cons- 有关可用性的问题
- 软件更新仅持续到 2028 年
- 无 OLED 屏幕
- 无 GPS 模块
- 无 4G/5G 选项
价格和供应情况在的新闻稿中关于 Pad Mini 的上市时间，小米只提到了 "部分市场"。至于是否包括欧盟市场，还有待观察。
对于 8/256 GB 的入门级版本，小米的零售价为 429 美元，约合 369 欧元。例如，12/512GB 的大存储版本在Aliexpress 上的售价约为 500 欧元（约合 580 美元）。在邮购公司Otto的价格约为 560 欧元。
Table of Contents判决规格外壳 - 采用轻质金属一体成型机身的小米 Pad Mini功能 - 配备 2x USB-C 接口的小米 Pad Mini软件 -Android 15，更新至 2028 年通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 WiFi 7，但没有移动通信和全球定位系统照相机 - 日光下的实用快照附件和保修 - 带问号的交货范围输入设备和操作 - 165 Hz 显示屏和笔支持显示屏 - 小米 Pad Mini，3K 分辨率，支持 HDR性能 - 配备高端 SoC 的小米 Pad Mini排放 - 多为酷平板电脑，扬声器性能良好电池寿命 - 持久耐用，可在 1 小时内完成充电Notebookcheck 总体评分可比较的替代品
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types
通过小米 Pad Mini，小米推出了全球版本的 红米 K Pad.后者在我们的测试中表现出色，其低廉的价格、高端的性能和超长的电池续航时间给人留下了深刻印象。
因此，小米 Pad Mini 有能力获得较高的评价，尤其是在规格保持不变的情况下。价格也保持在相当低的水平。
规格
Xiaomi Pad MiniProcessorMediatek Dimensity 9400+ 8 x - 3.7 GHz, Cortex-X925, X4, A720Graphics adapterARM Immortalis-G925 MC12Memory12 GB , LPDDR5XDisplay8.80 inch 16:10, 3008 x 1880 pixel 403 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, native pen support, TFT-LCD, Touch sampling rate up to 372 Hz, instant touch sampling up to 1080 Hz, 600 nits typical brightness, 700 nits HBM, glossy: yes, HDR, 165 HzStorage512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 512 GB , 492 GB freeConnections1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Hall sensor, Magnetic sensor, Proximity sensor, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3, Wi-Fi Direct, Miracast, USB-OTGNetworking802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4Sizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 6.46 x 205.13 x 132.03Battery7500 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 67W max. charging speed, 18W wired reverse charging, PD 3.0/2.0Chargingfast charging / QuickchargeOperating SystemAndroid 15CameraPrimary Camera: 13 MPix (Omnivision OV13B, f/2.2, 1/3.06", 1.12μm pixel size, PDAF), video recording up to 4K@30fpsSecondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.28, 1/4", 1.12μm pixel size), video recording up to 1080p@30fpsAdditional featuresSpeakers: stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos, Keyboard: virtual, USB-C cable (USB 2.0), quick start guide, warrany card, HyperOS 2.0, 12 Months Warranty, unibody metal design; HDR support: HDR10, HDR10+, HLG, Dolby Vision; no GPS; Bluetooth codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, LDAC, LDHC V1-V5; USB-C 3.2 Gen.1 port speed: 250 MB/s with Samsung Portable SSD T7; update policy: 2 OS version upgrades, 3 years of security updates til 2028-09, fanlessWeight326 g
Price500 EuroNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications
外壳 - 采用轻质金属一体成型机身的小米 Pad Mini8.8 英寸的小米 Pad Mini 仅重 326 克，感觉非常轻巧。它看起来也比 Apple iPad Mini 7由于它的显示屏边缘很窄，四边大约只有 7 毫米。除了我们的灰色测试机，小米还提供紫色的 Pad Mini。
Pad Mini 采用了坚固耐用、做工精良的金属一体成型外壳，表面经过磨砂处理，几乎不会留下任何指纹。这款平板电脑没有 IP 防护等级，小米也没有提供显示屏玻璃防护等级的任何信息。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
尺寸比较
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra Xiaomi Pad Mini Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) DIN A5 ❌
功能 - 配备 2x USB-C 接口的小米 Pad Mini这款配置精良的小米平板电脑有两个 USB-C 端口，可用于多种用途。例如，外接耳机可以连接到一个端口，而游戏控制器则可以连接到第二个 USB 端口。
底部的 USB-C 端口支持 USB 3.2 Gen.1，除了快速数据传输外，还支持向显示器输出图像。第二个 USB-C 端口位于平板电脑的右侧，运行速度为 USB 2.0。
WiFi Direct 和 Miracast 可用于无线数据传输。小米 Pad Mini 没有音频插孔和 microSD 插槽。
左：电源按钮、扬声器、麦克风
右：麦克风、USB-C 2.0、扬声器
顶部：音量摇杆
底部底部： USB-C 3.2 Gen.1
软件 -Android 15，更新至 2028 年小米 Pad Mini 运行Android 15，配备小米 HyperOS 2.0 用户界面。根据小米信任中心，Pad Mini 的操作系统将升级至Android 17。此外，它还将获得为期 3 年的安全更新，直至 2028 年 9 月。后者将每三个月发布一次。在 10 月中旬进行测试时，该平板电脑运行的是 8 月份的Android 安全补丁，因此是最新的。
可持续性小米 Pad Mini 采用无塑料包装。制造商没有提供任何有关平板电脑中可回收材料比例的信息。在其网站上，小米提供了以旧换新计划。以旧换新计划。
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 WiFi 7，但没有移动通信和全球定位系统小米 Pad Mini 支持 WiFi 7，但不支持 6 GHz 频段。使用我们的参考路由器--华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000，数据传输仍然快速稳定，最高可达 989 MBit/s。
有趣的是，中国版平板电脑 红米 K Pad在这项测试中取得了更好的成绩，尽管规格完全相同。它在传输数据时与 Pad Mini 大致相当，但在接收测试中却达到了 1657 MBit/s。
Pad Mini 没有 GPS 模块。小米也没有提供移动版平板电脑。
NetworkingXiaomi Pad Mini802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be iperf3 transmit AXE11000
983 (min: 922) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
919 (min: 776) MBit/s ∼84%
Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024)802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax iperf3 transmit AXE11000
934 (min: 861) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
804 (min: 671) MBit/s ∼74%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1446 (min: 1117) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1329 (min: 1163) MBit/s ∼86%
Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax iperf3 transmit AXE11000
808 (min: 402) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
737 (min: 358) MBit/s ∼67%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
578 (min: 420) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1539 (min: 1420) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9802.11 a/b/g/n/ac iperf3 transmit AXE11000
372 (min: 189) MBit/s ∼38%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
368 (min: 359) MBit/s ∼34%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be iperf3 transmit AXE11000
944 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1093 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1293 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1446 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼94%
Average of class Tablet iperf3 transmit AXE11000
569 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
634 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1251 (min: 578) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1464 (min: 746) MBit/s ∼95%
Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1446 (1117-1518) Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1329 (1163-1352) Xiaomi Pad Mini 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø984 (922-1020) Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø935 (861-962) Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø366 (189-388) Xiaomi Pad Mini 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø917 (776-971) Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø804 (671-820) Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø367 (359-369)
照相机 - 日光下的实用快照使用自拍相机拍摄Pad Mini 的 800 万像素前置摄像头可拍摄实用的自拍照，并以高达每秒 30 帧的速度录制 1080p 视频。主摄像头支持自动对焦，像素为 1300 万。它能以每秒 30 帧的速度录制高达 4K 的视频。
主摄像头的拍摄效果只能达到快照的水平，但在日光下看起来一点也不差。而变焦拍摄则比较模糊，弱光条件下也会让相机不堪重负。
测试实验室的测量结果证实了这一实际印象。在光线充足的条件下，主摄像头能准确再现参考色彩。在光线不足的情况下，只能获得暗淡、模糊的图像。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain camera5x zoomLow lightclick to load imagesXiaomi Pad MiniCanon EOS 90DOnePlus 13Samsung Galaxy Tab S110.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesXiaomi Pad MiniCanon EOS 90DOnePlus 13Samsung Galaxy Tab S110.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesXiaomi Pad MiniCanon EOS 90DOnePlus 13Samsung Galaxy Tab S110.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesXiaomi Pad MiniCanon EOS 90DOnePlus 13Samsung Galaxy Tab S110.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1x
10.4 ∆E3.6 ∆E5.2 ∆E11 ∆E2.2 ∆E4.5 ∆E7 ∆E6.7 ∆E7.1 ∆E8.6 ∆E6.1 ∆E7.9 ∆E8 ∆E9.4 ∆E7.1 ∆E9.1 ∆E5.6 ∆E3.2 ∆E10 ∆E6.2 ∆E4.3 ∆E8.9 ∆E10.1 ∆E8.2 ∆EColorChecker Xiaomi Pad Mini: 7.1 ∆E min: 2.22 - max: 10.96 ∆E29 ∆E52.8 ∆E38.3 ∆E35.9 ∆E43.9 ∆E61.1 ∆E52.5 ∆E34.7 ∆E41.9 ∆E28 ∆E63.6 ∆E62.4 ∆E29.9 ∆E48.1 ∆E36.5 ∆E74.6 ∆E42.6 ∆E41.4 ∆E83.9 ∆E69.2 ∆E51.1 ∆E36.5 ∆E23.9 ∆E13.5 ∆EColorChecker Xiaomi Pad Mini: 45.64 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 83.95 ∆E
Xiaomi Pad MiniXiaomi Pad Mini
附件和保修 - 带问号的交货范围我们测试设备的供货范围包括一个 67 瓦的电源装置和一条 USB-C 连接线。如果该平板电脑也在欧盟正式发布，那么很可能会缺少电源适配器。
小米在其全球网站上提供了平板电脑的保护套和屏幕保护膜，但未提及价格。Pad Mini 还支持触控笔，如小米 Focus Pen和红米手写笔.
在欧盟，小米通常提供 24 个月的 保修期保修。进口产品的保修期可能会缩短为 12 个月。
输入设备和操作 - 165 Hz 显示屏和笔支持得益于高达 165 Hz 的高帧频，小米 Pad Mini 的显示效果极为流畅。凭借 1080 Hz 的最大触摸采样率，它还能非常快速、精确地实现手指和笔的输入。X 轴振动电机提供了良好的触觉反馈，使操作更加流畅。
这款平板电脑没有指纹传感器。只能通过自拍摄像头的 2D 人脸识别功能进行生物识别验证。
键盘肖像
键盘景观显示屏 - 小米 Pad Mini，3K 分辨率，支持 HDR子像素结构在测试（APL18 测量）中，TFT LCD 的最大亮度达到 720 cd/m²，因此亮度值比平常略高。
3K 显示屏的宽高比为 16:10，分辨率为 3008 x 1880 像素。支持 HDR10、HDR10+、HLG 和 Dolby Vision，HDR 支持非常出色。不过，该显示屏在 HDR 模式下最高只能达到 508 cd/m²。
669cd/m²684cd/m²658cd/m²689cd/m²681cd/m²660cd/m²661cd/m²680cd/m²690cd/m²
Distribution of brightnesstested with X-Rite i1Pro 3Maximum: 690 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 674.7 cd/m² Minimum: 1.85 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 95 %Center on Battery: 681 cd/m²Contrast: 1195:1 (Black: 0.57 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.4 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)Gamma: 2.22CCT: 6922 K
Xiaomi Pad MiniTFT-LCD, 3008x1880, 8.8"Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024)IPS, 2266x1488, 8.3"Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini UltraLTPS, 2560x1600, 8.8"Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FULTPS, 2560x1600, 8.8"Samsung Galaxy Tab A9LCD TFT, 1340x800, 8.7"Screen-0%-73%9%-51%Brightness middle (cd/m²)681525 -23%555 -19%441 -35%486 -29%Brightness (cd/m²)675512 -24%523 -23%420 -38%462 -32%Brightness Distribution (%)9591 -4%88 -7%91 -4%92 -3%Black Level * (cd/m²)0.570.43 25%0.46 19%0.5 12%0.35 39%Contrast (:1)11951221 2%1207 1%882 -26%1389 16%Colorchecker dE 2000 *22 -0%6.4 -220%1.08 46%6.2 -210%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *4.74.3 9%12.6 -168%2.52 46%10.4 -121%Greyscale dE 2000 *3.43 12%9.1 -168%1.1 68%5.7 -68%Gamma2.22 99%2.2 100%2.31 95%2.19 100%2.12 104%CCT6922 94%7109 91%9616 68%6655 98%7911 82%* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM not detectedIn comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8152 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
TFT 液晶显示屏的对比度高达 1200:1，能准确再现参考色彩。虽然与目标有细微偏差，但这些偏差低于感知阈值，只有在使用光分光计进行分析时才会发现。
色彩准确度（图像模式 Original Color Pro，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩空间（图像模式 Original Color Pro，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
灰度（图像模式 Original Color Pro，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩饱和度（图像模式 Original Color Pro，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White14.89 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.025 ms rise↘ 10.86 ms fallThe screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey32.48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13.65 ms rise↘ 18.83 ms fallThe screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).
小米平板电脑还可以在户外阴凉处使用。不过，在直射光下，可视角度稳定的 TFT LCD 的亮度几乎不足以弥补玻璃表面的反光。
室外使用
室外使用视角性能 - 配备高端 SoC 的小米 Pad Mini小型小米平板电脑在性能方面遥遥领先。配备了 联发科 Dimensity 9400+，Pad Mini 甚至击败了 iPad Mini 7在许多基准测试中。在人工智能测试中，它的表现也非常出色。
只有在浏览器测试中，它远远落后。不过，这在日常使用中并不明显，因为这款小平板电脑可以用来快速浏览网页。
Geekbench 6.5 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench AI | AI Benchmark Geekbench 6.5
Single-CoreApple iPad Mini 7 (2024)Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
2989 Points +13%Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (2478 - 2798, n=5)
2657 Points 0%Xiaomi Pad MiniMediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
2652 Points Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FUQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2187 Points -18%Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
1867 Points -30%Average of class Tablet (185 - 4128, n=102, last 2 years)
1429 Points -46%Samsung Galaxy Tab A9Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
738 Points -72% Multi-CoreAverage Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (7749 - 9043, n=5)
8195 Points +2%Xiaomi Pad MiniMediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
8040 Points Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024)Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
7452 Points -7%Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FUQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6591 Points -18%Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
4828 Points -40%Average of class Tablet (848 - 16544, n=102, last 2 years)
4579 Points -43%Samsung Galaxy Tab A9Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2065 Points -74%Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi Pad MiniMediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
2626618 Points Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (2396591 - 2841845, n=5)
2571979 Points -2%Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FUQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1970442 Points -25%Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024)Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
1570229 Points -40%Average of class Tablet (164396 - 3475590, n=73, last 2 years)
1143367 Points -56%Samsung Galaxy Tab A9Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
383511 Points -85%PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FUQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
25683 Points +41%Xiaomi Pad MiniMediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
18208 Points Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (16985 - 18344, n=4)
17710 Points -3%Average of class Tablet (3195 - 27428, n=85, last 2 years)
12165 Points -33%Samsung Galaxy Tab A9Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
9083 Points -50%BaseMark OS II
OverallXiaomi Pad MiniMediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
11599 Points Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (7887 - 12637, n=5)
11338 Points -2%Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FUQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
8088 Points -30%Average of class Tablet (195 - 13159, n=68, last 2 years)
5758 Points -50%Samsung Galaxy Tab A9Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3120 Points -73% SystemAverage Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (9986 - 16550, n=5)
13968 Points +6%Xiaomi Pad MiniMediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
13140 Points Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FUQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
10983 Points -16%Average of class Tablet (904 - 18343, n=68, last 2 years)
8947 Points -32%Samsung Galaxy Tab A9Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
6776 Points -48% MemoryAverage Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (7836 - 13578, n=5)
11476 Points +2%Xiaomi Pad MiniMediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
11248 Points Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FUQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
7987 Points -29%Average of class Tablet (401 - 17963, n=68, last 2 years)
6779 Points -40%Samsung Galaxy Tab A9Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
4152 Points -63% GraphicsXiaomi Pad MiniMediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
55810 Points Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (26748 - 55810, n=5)
49322 Points -12%Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FUQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
28083 Points -50%Average of class Tablet (88 - 57192, n=68, last 2 years)
15366 Points -72%Samsung Galaxy Tab A9Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2683 Points -95% WebXiaomi Pad MiniMediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
2195 Points Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (1849 - 2267, n=5)
2138 Points -3%Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FUQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1789 Points -18%Average of class Tablet (10 - 2370, n=68, last 2 years)
1502 Points -32%Samsung Galaxy Tab A9Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1273 Points -42%UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi Pad MiniMediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
76852 Points Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (72895 - 76852, n=4)
74932 Points -2%Average of class Tablet (2597 - 76852, n=67, last 2 years)
16257 Points -79%Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FUQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
16237 Points -79%Samsung Galaxy Tab A9Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
6453 Points -92%AImark - Score v3.x
Xiaomi Pad MiniMediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
50153 Points Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (49562 - 50153, n=2)
49858 Points -1%Average of class Tablet (138 - 55794, n=57, last 2 years)
5710 Points -89%Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FUQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1485 Points -97%Samsung Galaxy Tab A9Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
982 Points -98%Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5Xiaomi Pad MiniMediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
1222 Points Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (1042 - 1233, n=5)
1161 Points -5%Average of class Tablet (166 - 5295, n=26, last 2 years)
709 Points -42%Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FUQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
499 Points -59%Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
439 Points -64% Half Precision NPU 1.5Xiaomi Pad MiniMediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
9263 Points Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (8659 - 9597, n=5)
9081 Points -2%Average of class Tablet (154 - 41155, n=26, last 2 years)
3638 Points -61%Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FUQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
497 Points -95%Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
442 Points -95% Quantized NPU 1.5Xiaomi Pad MiniMediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
12608 Points Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (11834 - 13099, n=5)
12428 Points -1%Average of class Tablet (88 - 57388, n=26, last 2 years)
5194 Points -59%Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FUQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1133 Points -91%Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
1019 Points -92%AI Benchmark - Score V6
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (1945 - 12713, n=5)
8349 Points +329%Average of class Tablet (70.4 - 12784, n=26, last 2 years)
3378 Points +73%Xiaomi Pad MiniMediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
1948 Points
其 Immortalis-G925图形芯片，小米 Pad Mini 还在 GPU 基准测试中获得了惊叹号。iPad Apple iPad Mini 7没有机会，只有 联想Legion Tab TB321FU能在一定程度上跟上。联想平板电脑在 GFXBench 屏幕测试中遥遥领先，但这只是因为小米 Pad Mini 的运行频率为 120 Hz。
3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Pad MiniImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
5678 Points Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FUAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5012 Points -12%Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024)A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
3347 Points -41%Samsung Galaxy Tab A9Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
345 Points -94%3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Pad MiniImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
5689 Points Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FUAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5088 Points -11%Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024)A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
3488 Points -39%Samsung Galaxy Tab A9Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
330 Points -94%3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Pad MiniImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
19751 Points Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FUAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
18627 Points -6%Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024)A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
14693 Points -26%Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini UltraAdreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11279 Points -43%Samsung Galaxy Tab A9Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1225 Points -94%3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Xiaomi Pad MiniImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
10051 Points Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FUAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8453 Points -16%Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024)A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
5820 Points -42%3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Pad MiniImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
10283 Points Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FUAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8501 Points -17%Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024)A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
5520 Points -46%3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Pad MiniImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2210 Points Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FUAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1689 Points -24%Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024)A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
1323 Points -40%Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini UltraAdreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
947 Points -57%3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Xiaomi Pad MiniImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2169 Points Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FUAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1707 Points -21%Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024)A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
1541 Points -29%Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini UltraAdreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
958 Points -56%GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FUAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
165 fps +38%Xiaomi Pad MiniImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024)A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
60 fps -50%Samsung Galaxy Tab A9Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
59 fps -51%GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad MiniImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
803 fps Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FUAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
533 fps -34%Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024)A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
447 fps -44%Samsung Galaxy Tab A9Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
63 fps -92%GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FUAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
165 fps +38%Xiaomi Pad MiniImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024)A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
60 fps -50%Samsung Galaxy Tab A9Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
58 fps -52%GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad MiniImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
362 fps Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FUAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
361 fps 0%Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024)A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
247 fps -32%Samsung Galaxy Tab A9Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps -89%GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FUAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
160 fps +37%Xiaomi Pad MiniImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
117 fps Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024)A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
60 fps -49%Samsung Galaxy Tab A9Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
50 fps -57%GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad MiniImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
305 fps Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FUAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
269 fps -12%Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024)A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
164 fps -46%Samsung Galaxy Tab A9Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps -92%GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FUAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
93 fps +21%Xiaomi Pad MiniImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
77 fps Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024)A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
60 fps -22%Samsung Galaxy Tab A9Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
27 fps -65%GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad MiniImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
166 fps Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FUAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
161 fps -3%Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024)A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
105 fps -37%Samsung Galaxy Tab A9Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps -91%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad MiniImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
77 fps Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FUAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
62 fps -19%Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024)A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
53.7 fps -30%Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini UltraAdreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps -40%Samsung Galaxy Tab A9Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps -77%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad MiniImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FUAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
72 fps -40%Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini UltraAdreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps -56%Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024)A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
41 fps -66%Samsung Galaxy Tab A9Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.6 fps -95%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FUAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
122 fps +10%Xiaomi Pad MiniImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
111 fps Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini UltraAdreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
72 fps -35%Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024)A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
60 fps -46%Samsung Galaxy Tab A9Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps -77%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad MiniImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
309 fps Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FUAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
188 fps -39%Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini UltraAdreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
138 fps -55%Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024)A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
133 fps -57%Samsung Galaxy Tab A9Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps -95%GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad MiniImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
52 fps Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FUAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
33 fps -37%Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini UltraAdreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps -56%Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024)A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
21.7 fps -58%Samsung Galaxy Tab A9Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.4 fps -95%
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | Speedometer 3 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) (Safari Mobile 18.1.1)
269.214 Points +107%Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra (Chrome 137)
239.594 Points +85%Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU (Chrome 135)
191.974 Points +48%Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (125.3 - 272, n=3)
175.7 Points +35%Average of class Tablet (22.3 - 395, n=72, last 2 years)
146.1 Points +13%Xiaomi Pad Mini (Chrome 141.0.7390.71)
129.818 Points Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (Chrome 212)
71.728 Points -45%Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) (Safari Mobile 18.1.1)
505 runs/min +222%Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 790, n=61, last 2 years)
186 runs/min +18%Xiaomi Pad Mini (Chrome 141.0.7390.71)
157 runs/min Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (n=1)
157 runs/min 0%Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (Chrome 212)
61.2 runs/min -61%Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) (Safari Mobile 18.1.1)
30.8 runs/min +180%Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU (Chrome 135)
17.6 runs/min +60%Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (9.67 - 25.8, n=3)
15.5 runs/min +41%Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 49.1, n=62, last 2 years)
14.2 runs/min +29%Xiaomi Pad Mini (Chrome 141.0.7390.71)
11 runs/min WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) (Safari Mobile 18.1.1)
267 Points +134%Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU (Chrome 135)
165 Points +45%Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (109 - 235, n=5)
160.8 Points +41%Average of class Tablet (26 - 376, n=76, last 2 years)
133.7 Points +17%Xiaomi Pad Mini (Chrome 141.0.7390.71)
114 Points Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (Chrome 212)
81 Points -29%Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) (Safari Mobile 18.1.1)
87812 Points +142%Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU (Chrome 135)
70635 Points +95%Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (33868 - 94555, n=5)
58165 Points +60%Average of class Tablet (763 - 138481, n=103, last 2 years)
40736 Points +12%Xiaomi Pad Mini (Chrome 141.0.7390.71)
36281 Points Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (Chrome 212)
22187 Points -39%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (243 - 27101, n=85, last 2 years)
2640 ms * -165%Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (Chrome 212)
1922.1 ms * -93%Xiaomi Pad Mini (Chrome 141.0.7390.71)
998.1 ms * Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (391 - 1140, n=5)
707 ms * +29%Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU (Chrome 135)
541.2 ms * +46%Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) (Safari Mobile 18.1.1)
332.1 ms * +67%* ... smaller is better
Xiaomi Pad MiniAlldocube iPlay 70 Mini UltraLenovo Legion Tab TB321FUSamsung Galaxy Tab A9Average 512 GB UFS 4.1 FlashAverage of class TabletAndroBench 3-5214%255%-10%241%84% Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)3585.321996.56 -44%3984.3 11%916.45 -74%3893 ?(3220 - 4110, n=16) 9%1656 ?(126.9 - 4093, n=90, last 2 years) -54% Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)1573.271866.05 19%3483.56 121%398.32 -75%3315 ?(1240 - 4035, n=16) 111%1213 ?(80.4 - 3773, n=90, last 2 years) -23% Random Read 4KB (MB/s)411.55392.27 -5%355.12 -14%182.74 -56%377 ?(280 - 488, n=16) -8%235 ?(20.1 - 475, n=90, last 2 years) -43% Random Write 4KB (MB/s)48.23474.41 884%483.73 903%128.92 167%458 ?(48.2 - 678, n=16) 850%267 ?(9.1 - 989, n=90, last 2 years) 454%
排放 - 多为酷平板电脑，扬声器性能良好温度在日常使用中，小米 Pad Mini 的外壳几乎不会发热。只有在长时间的负载情况下，例如进行烧毁基准测试时，其表面温度才会明显升高。即使在这种情况下，手持它也不会感到不舒服。在 3DMark 压力测试中，平板电脑的性能保持了很长时间，然后才会根据不同的情况下降到 71%。
Max. LoadIdle
40.5 °C41.6 °C41.9 °C 39.5 °C41.5 °C41.2 °C 38.3 °C41.4 °C41.3 °C
Maximum: 41.9 °CAverage: 40.8 °C
40.1 °C40.3 °C40.2 °C40 °C40.8 °C40.2 °C38.9 °C40 °C38.9 °C
Maximum: 40.8 °CAverage: 39.9 °C Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260Max. LoadIdle
25.8 °C25.3 °C24.7 °C 26.8 °C25.1 °C24.8 °C 24 °C24.4 °C24.6 °C
Maximum: 26.8 °CAverage: 25.1 °C
25.5 °C24.9 °C24.4 °C25.2 °C24.5 °C24.3 °C23.2 °C23.5 °C24 °C
Maximum: 25.5 °CAverage: 24.4 °C Room Temperature 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.9 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
3DMark 压力测试
3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test StabilitySamsung Galaxy Tab A9Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % +32%Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini UltraAdreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95.3 % +26%Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024)A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
90.4 % +20%Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FUAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
76.5 % +1%Xiaomi Pad MiniImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
75.6 % Wild Life Extreme Stress TestSamsung Galaxy Tab A9Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.1 % +34%Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FUAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
85.7 % +17%Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024)A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
73.9 % +1%Xiaomi Pad MiniImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
73.1 % Solar Bay Stress Test StabilityApple iPad Mini 7 (2024)A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
90.6 % +27%Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FUAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
84.3 % +18%Xiaomi Pad MiniImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
71.4 % Steel Nomad Light Stress Test StabilityAlldocube iPlay 70 Mini UltraAdreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98.3 % +28%Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FUAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
92.3 % +20%Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024)A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
79.1 % +3%Xiaomi Pad MiniImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
76.8 %
Xiaomi Pad Mini Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.1: Ø28.6 (24.7-33.8) Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø17.1 (16.7-22.5) Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.07 (2.05-2.09) Xiaomi Pad Mini Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø91.1 (82.5-109.1) Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø55 (54.2-59.9) Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.53 (7.52-7.56) Xiaomi Pad Mini Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø116.1 (113.7-116.5) Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø61.5 (58-87.9) Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø16.3 (16.2-16.7) Xiaomi Pad Mini Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.2: Ø29.6 (24.3-34) Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability: Ø16.1 (15.9-17.6) Xiaomi Pad Mini Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.1: Ø14.5 (12.3-16.1) Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability: Ø9.2 (8.99-11.4)
发言人立体声扬声器通过线性的中音和高音产生非常好的音效，甚至在混音中也能听到较低的频率。外部音频设备可通过两个 USB-C 端口或蓝牙 5.4 连接。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Xiaomi Pad Mini audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.5% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15% difference to median)Compared to same class» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 63% worse» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%Compared to all devices tested» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.6 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(±) | higher highs - on average 7.2% higher than median(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)Compared to same class» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 18% worse» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%Compared to all devices tested» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池寿命 - 持久耐用，可在 1 小时内完成充电耗电量7500 毫安时电池的充电功率可达 67 瓦。使用小米电源装置，一个完整的充电周期大约需要一个小时。甚至还支持 18 瓦的反向充电。
Power Consumption
Off / Standby 0.08 / 0.13 WattIdle 1.08 / 4.13 / 4.15 Watt
Load
10.69 / 11.08 Watt
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Pad Mini7500 mAhApple iPad Mini 7 (2024)5078 mAhAlldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra7300 mAhLenovo Legion Tab TB321FU6550 mAhSamsung Galaxy Tab A95100 mAhAverage Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ Average of class Tablet Power Consumption5%-9%21%30%-23%-16%Idle Minimum * (Watt)1.080.95 12%1.36 -26%1.4 -30%0.7 35%2.21 ?(0.83 - 3.9, n=5) -105%1.996 ?(0.7 - 5.6, n=82, last 2 years) -85%Idle Average * (Watt)4.133.76 9%4.16 -1%1.9 54%2.94 29%4.02 ?(1.06 - 6.31, n=5) 3%3.88 ?(1 - 9.2, n=82, last 2 years) 6%Idle Maximum * (Watt)4.153.79 9%4.21 -1%2.6 37%3.03 27%4.17 ?(1.09 - 6.35, n=5) -0%4.22 ?(1.3 - 9.5, n=82, last 2 years) -2%Load Average * (Watt)10.696.75 37%6.6 38%7.49 30%10.2 ?(5.93 - 12.5, n=5) 5%8.98 ?(2.5 - 34.9, n=76, last 2 years) 16%Load Maximum * (Watt)11.0815.56 -40%10.4 6%8.02 28%13.2 ?(11.1 - 15.8, n=5) -19%13 ?(4.6 - 41.6, n=76, last 2 years) -17%* ... smaller is better
功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Xiaomi Pad Mini Mediatek Dimensity 9400+; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.91 (2.15-11.1) Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) Apple A17 Pro; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.16 (1.601-15.8) Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mediatek Helio G99; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.04 (1.429-4.98) Xiaomi Pad Mini Mediatek Dimensity 9400+; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.783 (1.733-2.4) Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) Apple A17 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.764 (1.716-1.829) Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mediatek Helio G99; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.459 (1.412-1.55)
功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
Xiaomi Pad Mini Mediatek Dimensity 9400+; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.9 (10.1-11) Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) Apple A17 Pro; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.9 (6.58-15.4) Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mediatek Helio G99; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.88 (2.65-3.09) Xiaomi Pad Mini Mediatek Dimensity 9400+; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.783 (1.733-2.4) Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) Apple A17 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.764 (1.716-1.829) Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mediatek Helio G99; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.459 (1.412-1.55)
电池寿命虽然小米 Pad Mini 的功耗有时明显高于对比设备，但在电池续航时间方面却不占优势。在 WLAN 测试中，这款小型平板电脑的续航时间接近 20 小时，甚至超过了 Apple iPad Mini 7甩在了后面。
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
19h 37min
Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3
Xiaomi Pad Mini7500 mAh
19.6 h Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024)5078 mAh
12 h Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra7300 mAh
15.9 h Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU6550 mAh
17.3 h Samsung Galaxy Tab A95100 mAh
14.3 h
Notebookcheck 总体评分在测试中，小米 Pad Mini 给人留下了深刻印象，它是一款设备齐全、功能强大的平板电脑，与Apple iPad Mini 7 等竞争对手相比，小米 Pad Mini 难占上风。不过，由于这款 8.8 英寸的小米平板电脑尚未在欧盟正式发售，因此在测试时也很难买到。
Back to the verdict
Xiaomi Pad Mini
- 10/24/2025 v8
Manuel Masiero
Chassis85 / 98 → 87%
Keyboard68 / 80 → 85%
Pointing Device94%
Connectivity62 / 69 → 89%
Weight86 / 40-88 → 96%
Battery92%
Display85%
Games Performance47 / 65 → 73%
Application Performance73 / 92 → 79%
AI Performance78%
Temperature88%
Noise100%
Audio83 / 91 → 92%
Camera60 / 90 → 67%
Average68%
89%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 EmissionsNo DataMaterials40%Packaging75%Power Use96.2%Repairability20%Software Updates50% Total Sustainability Score: 46.9%
可比较的替代品
ImageModel / ReviewPriceWeightDriveDisplay
1.88.5%Xiaomi Pad MiniMediatek Dimensity 9400+ ⎘ ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 ⎘12 GB Memory, 512 GB Amazon: 1. $8.99Suttkue For Xiaomi Pad Mini ...2. $229.50Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Only WiFi...3. $9.90Case for Xiaomi Pad Mini 8.8...List Price: 500€326 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash8.80"3008x1880403 PPITFT-LCD
2.86.6%Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024)Apple A17 Pro ⎘ Apple A17 Pro GPU ⎘8 GB Memory, 512 GB SSDAmazon: $499.00List Price: 1149€297 gApple 512GB NVMe8.30"2266x1488327 PPIIPS
3.84%Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 732 ⎘12 GB Memory, 256 GB Amazon: 1. $369.99ALLDOCUBE iPlay 70 mini Ultr...2. $209.99ALLDOCUBE iPlay 70 mini Pro ...3. $11.79Clear Case for ALLDOCUBE iPl...List Price: 400€335 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash8.80"2560x1600343 PPILTPS
4.86.5%Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FUQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘12 GB Memory, 256 GB Amazon: 1. $8.99Callyue Case for Lenovo Legi...2. $12.90Protective case for 8.8-inch...3. $9.99Suttkue for Lenovo Legion Ta...List Price: 599€350 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash8.80"2560x1600343 PPILTPS
5.84.1% v7 (old)Samsung Galaxy Tab A9Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘4 GB Memory, 64 GB UFS 2.1Amazon: $116.00List Price: 179€332 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash8.70"1340x800179 PPILCD TFT
TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 650972 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:
Please share our article, every link counts!